🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.